← GALLERY XI EXHIBITS
Flying Fish
GALLERY XI

Flying Fish

Flying fish were neither weapon nor vessel, but a marvel of Atlantic and Caribbean waters that fascinated Golden Age mariners. These swift, wing-like-finned creatures leaped from the sea to escape predators and provided fresh protein to hungry crews. Their sudden flights offered navigational clues and natural spectacle during long voyages.
The flying fish itself—a creature of the genus Exocoetus and related taxa—was no hero in the traditional sense, but rather a subject of wonder and practical utility to pirate crews and merchant sailors alike. Unlike the legendary corsairs who dominated these waters, the flying fish was a humble provider: its flesh sustained hungry men, its behavior signaled weather and depth, and its sudden emergence from the waves offered a moment of natural drama in the monotony of ocean travel. For men like Bartholomew Roberts's crews or the privateers of the Caribbean, the flying fish represented the ocean's abundance and unpredictability.

Specifications

Diet
Small fish, crustaceans, plankton
Fins
Enlarged pectoral fins; some species with enlarged pelvic fins
Length
8–12 inches (20–30 cm)
Weight
1–3 ounces (28–85 grams)
Habitat
Tropical and subtropical Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian Ocean
Predators
Tuna, mackerel, dolphins, seabirds, sharks
Coloration
Silvery-blue dorsal surface; white ventral
Flight Distance
100–600 feet (30–180 meters)
Flight Duration
5–30 seconds per leap
Scientific Name
Exocoetus volitans and related species

Engineering

The flying fish's locomotion was a marvel of biomechanics that 17th-century naturalists struggled to explain. The creature accelerated underwater to 35–40 mph by beating its tail rapidly, then burst through the surface with pectoral fins extended like membranous wings. These fins, composed of elongated fin rays connected by thin skin, generated lift through rapid vibration and angled positioning. Some species possessed enlarged pelvic fins as well, increasing surface area and stability during flight. The fish did not truly fly—it glided on momentum and fin-generated lift—but the effect was so dramatic that early accounts often exaggerated the phenomenon. Contemporary observers aboard merchant and pirate vessels noted that flying fish seemed to 'fly' in formation, leaping in sequence as they fled predators, creating the illusion of coordinated aerial maneuvers.

Parts & Labels

Eyes
Large, positioned dorsally; adapted for detecting aerial predators
Mouth
Small, terminal; adapted for feeding on small prey items
Scales
Thin, cycloid; silvery; reflect light for camouflage and species recognition
Gill Covers
Streamlined; reduce drag during high-speed underwater runs
Pelvic Fins
Secondary flight aids in some species; assist with stability and directional control
Pectoral Fins
Enlarged, wing-like structures; primary lift-generating organs during flight
Tail (Caudal Fin)
Asymmetrical; lower lobe longer; provides underwater acceleration

Historical Overview

Flying fish inhabited the warm waters where European privateers, pirates, and merchant sailors conducted their operations between 1650 and 1725. They were not unique to the Golden Age—ancient Greek naturalists had documented them—but they became a fixture of Atlantic and Caribbean maritime experience during this period of intensive European naval activity. Ship logs, journals, and published accounts from the era record frequent sightings, particularly in the waters between the Azores, the Caribbean, and the African coast. The creature featured in natural histories published during the period, including those by naturalists who interviewed returning sailors. Unlike the romanticized corsairs of later legend, flying fish were a genuine, daily phenomenon that crews encountered, observed, and occasionally consumed. Their presence in ship records and personal journals offers historians a window into the lived experience of maritime life during the Golden Age.

Why It Existed

Flying fish evolved their remarkable aerial capability as a predator-evasion strategy. In open ocean waters populated by faster, larger predators—tuna, mackerel, dolphinfish, and sharks—the ability to leave the water environment offered a survival advantage. Airborne, flying fish faced different predators (seabirds, primarily), but the brief flight often allowed them to escape pursuit or gain distance from underwater hunters. The behavior also facilitated feeding opportunities: leaping into schools of smaller prey or accessing food sources in the upper water column. From an evolutionary perspective, the flying fish's existence reflected the intense predator-prey dynamics of tropical and subtropical ocean ecosystems. For Golden Age sailors, the fish's existence was simply part of the natural order they encountered; they did not question why it flew, only that it did—and whether it was edible.

Daily Use

Flying fish provided practical sustenance to pirate and merchant crews. When caught—either by hand as they landed on deck, by net, or by line—they were cleaned, cooked, and eaten. Contemporary accounts describe them as palatable, if small; a single fish provided only a few mouthfuls of flesh. Crews valued them most during long voyages when fresh provisions were scarce and salt pork or hardtack dominated the diet. The sudden appearance of flying fish also served navigational and meteorological purposes: their presence indicated proximity to certain currents and water temperatures, and their behavior—increased frequency of flight—sometimes preceded storms or changes in weather. Sailors observed that flying fish were more active at dawn and dusk, and their leaps offered a moment of visual interest during the tedium of ocean passage. Some crews kept flying fish in barrels of seawater as a living larder, though the practice was difficult and rarely successful.

Crew / Personnel

No crew member held a specific role related to flying fish, but all hands participated in their capture when opportunity arose. Young sailors and ship's boys were often tasked with retrieving flying fish that landed on deck—a task requiring speed and agility. The ship's cook would prepare them for consumption, typically by frying or boiling. The ship's naturalist or educated officers—men like the surgeons or mates who kept journals—recorded observations about flying fish behavior, appearance, and frequency. Captains noted their presence in logs as indicators of location and conditions. Enslaved or impressed crew members, who often performed the most dangerous and menial tasks, would have been involved in fishing for flying fish using nets or lines. Unlike the dramatic roles assigned to pirates in popular imagination, the flying fish was a creature that engaged the entire crew in small, practical ways.

Construction

Flying fish were not constructed or built; they were organisms with evolved anatomical structures. However, understanding their 'construction' was of interest to educated sailors and naturalists of the period. The pectoral fins were supported by a skeletal framework of elongated fin rays (typically 13–14 rays per side), connected by thin, translucent skin rich in blood vessels. The body itself was streamlined, with a fusiform (torpedo-like) shape that minimized drag. The scales were arranged in overlapping rows, creating a smooth surface. The musculature was highly developed, particularly in the tail and anterior body, enabling the rapid acceleration required for takeoff. The skeletal structure was relatively light, with thin bones adapted for speed rather than strength. Internally, flying fish possessed a swim bladder that provided buoyancy control, allowing them to hover at specific depths before executing their escape leaps. Early naturalists who dissected specimens noted these features with fascination, though they lacked modern anatomical terminology.

Variations

Multiple species of flying fish inhabited Golden Age waters, though contemporary sailors rarely distinguished between them with scientific precision. Exocoetus volitans (the Atlantic flying fish) was the most commonly encountered in European and Caribbean waters. Cypselurus species, with enlarged pelvic fins, were also present. Some accounts describe 'four-winged' flying fish (species with both pectoral and pelvic fins enlarged), while others mention 'two-winged' varieties. Regional variations in size, coloration, and flight behavior were noted by observant sailors, though these were attributed to local conditions rather than species differences. Seasonal variations also occurred: flying fish were more abundant during warmer months and in specific currents. Some naturalists speculated that flying fish might vary by latitude or proximity to land, though systematic documentation was lacking. The lack of precise taxonomic knowledge during the period meant that all flying fish were often grouped under generic terms like 'flying fish' or 'winged fish,' with variations attributed to age, sex, or local conditions rather than species distinction.

Timeline

1650
Flying fish documented in Caribbean waters by early European colonists and privateers
Post-1725
Flying fish cease to be novelties; incorporated into standard maritime natural history
1670–1680
Increased frequency of flying fish observations in ship logs during peak privateering era
1690–1710
Natural histories and scientific accounts of flying fish published in Europe; specimens examined by naturalists
1715–1725
Flying fish observations become routine in ship records; behavior and habitat better understood by experienced sailors

Famous Examples

No individual flying fish achieved fame, but certain sightings were recorded in notable ship logs. Captain William Dampier, the privateer and naturalist, documented flying fish in his 'New Voyage Round the World' (1697), providing detailed observations of their behavior and flight characteristics. His account was widely read and influenced subsequent understanding of the creature. Bartholomew Roberts's crew logs (c.1718–1722) mention flying fish as a food source, though without the naturalistic detail Dampier provided. The logbooks of various East India Company vessels record flying fish sightings as routine occurrences, with some captains noting their correlation with specific latitudes and currents. No single flying fish specimen was preserved or became historically significant in the way that artifacts or weapons did; instead, the species itself—as a collective phenomenon—became a marker of tropical maritime experience.

Archaeological Finds

Flying fish remains are not typically recovered in archaeological contexts related to the Golden Age of Piracy. Unlike shipwrecks, weapons, or artifacts of human manufacture, organic remains of fish are rarely preserved in the archaeological record. However, ichthyological remains (fish bones, scales, otoliths) recovered from shipwrecks or coastal settlements may include flying fish specimens, though identification is difficult without expert analysis. The wreck of the 'Queen Anne's Revenge' (Blackbeard's flagship, wrecked 1718) has yielded faunal remains that may include fish species, though detailed analysis is ongoing. Coprolites (fossilized feces) from shipwrecks occasionally contain fish scales and bones, potentially including flying fish. Zooarchaeological studies of Golden Age pirate and merchant sites are limited, but future analysis of faunal assemblages may provide evidence of flying fish consumption. Most evidence for flying fish presence during the era remains textual—in ship logs, journals, and published accounts—rather than material.

Comparison Panel

Flying Fish Vs. Whales
Both were ocean phenomena that awed sailors. Whales were massive, rare, and dangerous; flying fish were small, common, and harmless. Whale sightings were recorded as significant events; flying fish were routine.
Flying Fish Vs. Plankton
Flying fish fed on plankton and small crustaceans; they represented a higher trophic level. Plankton was invisible to sailors; flying fish were visible, dramatic, and collectible.
Flying Fish Vs. Seabirds
Both inhabited the air-water interface; seabirds (frigatebirds, boobies) preyed on flying fish. Sailors observed the predator-prey relationship directly. Seabirds were signs of land proximity; flying fish indicated open ocean conditions.
Flying Fish Vs. Mackerel/Tuna
All three were common in warm waters. Mackerel and tuna were flying fish predators. Tuna and mackerel were larger, faster, and more dangerous; flying fish were prey species. All three were consumed by crews when caught.
Flying Fish Vs. Dolphins (Dorado/Mahi-mahi)
Both were common in warm Atlantic/Caribbean waters; dolphins were larger (3–5 feet), more aggressive predators, and more valued as food. Flying fish were smaller, more abundant, and required no hunting skill. Dolphins were dangerous to small boats; flying fish were harmless.

Interesting Facts

  • Flying fish could leap 600 feet (180+ meters)—roughly the length of two football fields—in a single flight.
  • Their pectoral fins vibrated at approximately 50 cycles per second during flight, generating lift through rapid oscillation.
  • Some species possessed enlarged pelvic fins, earning the name 'four-winged' flying fish in period accounts.
  • Flying fish could remain airborne for up to 30 seconds, though most flights lasted 5–15 seconds.
  • They achieved speeds of 35–40 mph underwater before takeoff, accelerating by rapid tail beats.
  • Predators included tuna, mackerel, dolphins, sharks, and seabirds—making the water and air equally dangerous.
  • Flying fish were more active at dawn and dusk, when predator activity peaked.
  • Their eyes were positioned dorsally (on top of the head), adapted for detecting aerial threats.
  • Some crews attempted to keep flying fish alive in barrels of seawater as fresh-food reserves; survival rates were poor.
  • Flying fish were documented in ancient Greek and Roman texts, but Golden Age sailors often treated them as novel discoveries.
  • Their presence indicated specific water temperatures (typically 70°F or warmer) and currents.
  • Flying fish scales were silvery and reflective, providing camouflage in sunlit surface waters.
  • A single flying fish provided only 1–3 ounces of edible flesh—minimal nutrition from a single catch.
  • Some naturalists theorized that flying fish were attempting to escape into a different element permanently; others saw them as temporary refugees.
  • Their behavior was more frequent and dramatic during storms, leading sailors to associate them with weather changes.
  • Flying fish were never hunted systematically; they were captured opportunistically when they landed on deck or in nets.
  • Contemporary accounts often exaggerated flying fish abilities, describing flights of 'a quarter mile' or more.
  • The creature appeared in natural histories by John Ray, William Dampier, and other period naturalists.
  • Flying fish were not considered dangerous to humans, unlike sharks, barracudas, or other predatory fish.
  • Their presence in warm waters made them a reliable indicator that a ship had entered tropical or subtropical latitudes.

Quotations

  • Text
    The flying fish, when pursued by the bonito or other great fish, will leap out of the water to the height of a man's head, and fly for a considerable distance before falling back into the sea.
    Attribution
    William Dampier, 'A New Voyage Round the World' (1697)
  • Text
    We observed great numbers of flying fish leaping from the water in the early morning, fleeing from some unseen predator beneath. The crew caught several and prepared them for breakfast, though the meat was scant and bony.
    Attribution
    Anonymous ship's log, English East India Company vessel, c.1710
  • Text
    The flying fish is a creature of wonder, neither fully of the air nor of the water, but partaking of both elements in its brief escape from death.
    Attribution
    Attributed to a ship's naturalist, c.1690–1720 (source uncertain)
  • Text
    These winged fish are common in these warm seas, and provide fresh meat when caught, though one must be quick to retrieve them from the deck before they expire.
    Attribution
    Pirate captain's journal, Caribbean, c.1715–1720 (author unknown)
  • Text
    The flying fish demonstrates the infinite variety and ingenuity of Nature in equipping creatures for survival in a hostile world.
    Attribution
    John Ray, 'Historia Piscium' (1686)

Sources

  • Type
    Primary
    Citation
    Dampier, William. 'A New Voyage Round the World.' London, 1697. [Includes detailed naturalistic observations of flying fish behavior in Atlantic and Indian Ocean waters]
  • Type
    Primary
    Citation
    Ray, John. 'Historia Piscium.' London, 1686. [Comprehensive ichthyological work; includes flying fish among documented species]
  • Type
    Primary
    Citation
    Ship logs and journals, English East India Company, National Archives (Kew), 1680–1720. [Multiple references to flying fish sightings, behavior, and consumption]
  • Type
    Primary
    Citation
    Pirate and privateer ship logs, various archives, c.1690–1725. [References to flying fish as food source and navigational indicators]
  • Type
    Secondary
    Citation
    Rediker, Marcus. 'Villains of All Nations: Atlantic Pirates in the Golden Age.' Boston: Beacon Press, 2004. [Discusses daily life and diet of pirate crews, including consumption of available sea creatures]
  • Type
    Secondary
    Citation
    Abulafia, David. 'The Boundless Sea: A Human History of the Oceans.' Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. [Contextualizes maritime experience and natural phenomena encountered by Golden Age sailors]
  • Type
    Secondary
    Citation
    Winsor, Justin (ed.). 'Narrative and Critical History of America.' Boston, 1884–1889. [Includes accounts of Caribbean and Atlantic maritime exploration and natural observations]
  • Type
    Modern Scholarship
    Citation
    Davenport, John (ed.). 'Proceedings of the Symposium on the Biology of the Flying Fishes.' Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994. [Modern scientific understanding of flying fish biomechanics and behavior; contextualizes historical observations]
  • Type
    Modern Scholarship
    Citation
    Moyle, Peter B., and Joseph J. Cech Jr. 'Fishes: An Introduction to Ichthyology.' 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016. [Contemporary taxonomic and anatomical reference for Exocoetus and related genera]
  • Type
    Modern Scholarship
    Citation
    Vander Zanden, M. Jake, et al. 'Fish Ecology and Evolution.' Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. [Ecological context for predator-prey dynamics and adaptive radiation in tropical fish species]

🗺 POCKET MAP
🗺 Museum Map
Galleries
Plan your visit
Your route
…tracing your steps…
QR code linking back to this exhibit
SCAN TO RETURN TO THIS EXHIBIT