GALLERY I
Snow
The snow was a two-masted merchant and pirate vessel (60–90 tons) dominant in Atlantic commerce and predation, 1680–1725. Its distinctive trysail mast enabled superior windward performance and maneuverability. Snows were favored by pirates including Bartholomew Roberts; the Whydah wreck (1717) provides detailed archaeological evidence of construction and provisioning.
The snow was the workhorse of Atlantic commerce and predation during the Golden Age of Piracy. Unlike the larger ship or the nimble sloop, the snow occupied a critical middle ground—fast enough to chase merchant vessels, capacious enough to carry substantial cargo or crew, and maneuverable enough to escape naval pursuit or navigate shallow colonial harbors. Built primarily in New England and the British Isles between 1680 and 1720, snows were favored by both legitimate traders and pirates including Captain Bartholomew Roberts, whose snow Royal Fortune (1720) became one of the most feared vessels of the era. The snow's distinctive double-mast configuration, with a trysail mast stepped immediately behind the main mast, gave it superior sail control and made it the preferred platform for raiders operating from Madagascar to the Caribbean.
Specifications
- Beam
- 18–25 feet
- Cost
- £400–£800 (new build, 1700–1720)
- Crew
- 20–50 men (merchant); 40–80 men (pirate)
- Draft
- 8–12 feet
- Masts
- Two (main and fore), plus trysail mast
- Range
- 3,000–4,000 nautical miles with provisioning
- Sails
- Square sails on fore and main; fore-and-aft sails on trysail mast
- Speed
- 8–12 knots in good conditions
- Length
- 50–75 feet
- Tonnage
- 40–120 tons (most commonly 60–90 tons)
- Armament
- 4–12 guns (merchant); 8–16 guns (pirate-converted)
- Construction Time
- 6–12 months
Engineering
The snow's defining innovation was the trysail mast—a small, independent spar positioned directly abaft the main mast, allowing a fore-and-aft sail (the trysail) to be set independently of the square sails. This configuration granted unprecedented flexibility: a snow could maintain headway in light winds using only the trysail, or deploy full canvas for pursuit. The hull design favored shallow draft and relatively narrow beam, enabling snows to operate in waters where larger ships of 200+ tons could not venture. The double-mast arrangement also distributed stress more evenly than single-mast designs, reducing the catastrophic failure risk in heavy weather. Snows typically featured a pronounced sheer (upward curve toward bow and stern) and a rounded bow, characteristics that improved seaworthiness in Atlantic swells while maintaining cargo capacity. The relatively modest size meant faster construction and lower capital investment than ships, making snows attractive to colonial shipyards and pirate syndicates alike.
Parts & Labels
- Jib
- Triangular sail forward of fore mast
- Hold
- Interior cargo space, typically divided into fore and aft compartments
- Bilge
- Lowest interior space; collected water requiring regular pumping
- Trysail
- Fore-and-aft sail on trysail mast; essential for windward work
- Bowsprit
- Spar extending forward from bow; carried jib and flying jib
- Gunwales
- Upper edges of hull sides; mounted gun carriages
- Topsails
- Square sails above courses on both masts
- Fore Mast
- Forward vertical spar; carried square sails
- Main Mast
- Primary vertical spar; carried square sails and upper rigging
- Staysails
- Fore-and-aft sails between masts
- Forecastle
- Raised deck forward; crew quarters and anchor work
- Fore Course
- Large square sail on fore mast
- Main Course
- Large square sail on main mast
- Quarterdeck
- Raised deck aft; captain's domain and gun platform
- Trysail Mast
- Small vertical spar stepped immediately behind main mast; carried the trysail (fore-and-aft sail)
- Topgallant Sails
- Uppermost square sails on both masts
Historical Overview
The snow emerged in the 1660s as a refinement of the earlier sloop and brigantine designs, achieving widespread adoption by the 1680s. Dutch and English shipwrights, particularly those in New England, recognized that the trysail mast solved a critical problem: vessels of 60–90 tons struggled to work to windward in light air or when heavily laden. By the 1690s, snows dominated the colonial merchant fleet—employed in the triangular trade (rum, molasses, enslaved persons), the timber trade, and coastal provisioning. When piracy intensified after 1695, particularly with the emergence of Indian Ocean raiders, snows became the preferred capture for pirates. The vessel's speed, cargo capacity, and ability to navigate both open ocean and shallow colonial waters made it ideal for raiding merchant convoys and then retreating to remote anchorages. Between 1700 and 1725, snows accounted for approximately 15–20 percent of documented pirate vessels, a proportion second only to sloops. The snow's dominance in piracy declined after 1725 as naval patrols intensified and colonial authorities invested in faster, better-armed naval vessels designed specifically to counter pirate snows.
Why It Existed
The snow was a direct response to the limitations of earlier two-masted designs in the context of expanding Atlantic commerce. Merchant vessels needed to carry cargo profitably while maintaining sufficient speed to avoid pirates and privateers; naval vessels required similar balance. The trysail mast innovation allowed shipwrights to increase cargo capacity without sacrificing windward performance—a critical advantage in an era when predictable, scheduled transatlantic passages were becoming economically essential. For pirates, the snow offered an ideal platform: it was fast enough to overtake most merchant vessels, capacious enough to carry plunder and provisions for extended cruises, and small enough to be crewed by 40–60 men (manageable for a pirate syndicate), yet large enough to mount sufficient guns (8–12) to intimidate merchant crews. The snow's prevalence in New England shipyards also meant that captured snows could be refitted quickly and cheaply, making them economically attractive to pirate captains operating on limited budgets. The vessel thus existed at the intersection of legitimate commerce and predation—equally suited to both, and therefore equally desired by both.
Daily Use
A merchant snow's daily routine centered on maintaining sail trim and cargo security. The watch system divided the crew into two or three shifts, each responsible for sail adjustment, steering, and lookout duties. In fair weather, the crew would spend mornings on maintenance—splicing rope, caulking seams, tarring rigging. Afternoons often involved trading or provisioning at colonial ports; the snow's shallow draft allowed it to enter rivers and harbors inaccessible to larger ships. A pirate snow operated under different pressures. The crew maintained constant vigilance for merchant vessels and naval patrols, with lookouts stationed at the masthead during daylight. Sail handling was practiced obsessively; the ability to deploy or furl canvas rapidly could mean the difference between capture and escape. Gunnery drills were frequent and mandatory. The captain (often elected or subject to articles) held authority over navigation and tactical decisions, while the quartermaster managed provisions, discipline, and the distribution of plunder. Food aboard both merchant and pirate snows consisted primarily of salt beef, salt pork, hardtack, dried peas, and beer; fresh water was rationed carefully. Disease, particularly scurvy and dysentery, was endemic; snows operating on long cruises suffered mortality rates of 10–20 percent from illness alone.
Crew / Personnel
- Cook
- Prepared meals in the galley; managed provisions and rationing. Often an older sailor, sometimes disabled from injury.
- Pilot
- Hired for navigation in unfamiliar or dangerous waters; particularly valuable in Caribbean and Indian Ocean operations.
- Gunner
- Responsible for cannons, powder, shot, and gunnery training. In pirate snows, a critical role; in merchant snows, often a senior sailor with artillery experience.
- Master
- Senior navigator and sailing master; responsible for daily seamanship, watch rotation, and sail trim. Merchant snows always had a master; pirate snows sometimes combined this role with the captain.
- Captain
- Master of the vessel; responsible for navigation, sail plan decisions, and tactical command. In pirate snows, often elected by crew or subject to articles; in merchant snows, appointed by owners and answerable to them.
- Surgeon
- Present on larger snows and most pirate vessels; treated wounds, amputations, and illness. Pirate surgeons were often captured merchant surgeons or apprentices with limited training.
- Boatswain
- Petty officer responsible for rigging, sail maintenance, and crew discipline. Commanded work parties and reported to the master.
- Carpenter
- Maintained the hull, masts, and wooden structures. Responsible for damage control and emergency repairs.
- Supercargo
- Merchant snows only; represented the cargo owners and managed commercial transactions at ports.
- Able Seamen
- Experienced sailors capable of all shipboard tasks; formed the core of the working crew.
- Quartermaster
- In pirate snows, second-in-command; managed provisions, enforced discipline, and oversaw plunder distribution. In merchant snows, a senior petty officer responsible for stores and supplies.
- Ordinary Seamen
- Less experienced sailors; performed routine tasks under supervision.
- Apprentices / Boys
- Young crew members, often 12–16 years old; performed menial tasks and learned seamanship.
Construction
Snow construction followed established shipwright practices of the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The process began with the laying of the keel—a heavy timber typically 50–75 feet long, made from oak or similar hardwood. Frames (ribs) were then erected perpendicular to the keel, spaced approximately 18 inches apart; these provided the hull's structural skeleton. The planking—outer hull boards, typically 1.5–2 inches thick—was then attached to the frames using wooden pegs (trunnels) and iron nails. The planking was caulked (sealed) with oakum (tarred rope fibers) driven into seams using a caulking iron and mallet, then sealed with pitch or tar. The deck was laid using similar planking, with gaps left for hatches (cargo access) and the mast partners (openings for masts). The trysail mast was stepped (installed) immediately abaft the main mast, typically 12–16 feet aft. Masts were made from single trees or spliced together from multiple pieces; the main mast was typically 45–60 feet tall. Rigging—the network of ropes supporting the masts and controlling the sails—was then installed, a process requiring weeks of labor. The entire construction process, from keel-laying to launch, typically required 6–12 months for a 60–90 ton snow, depending on the availability of materials and labor. New England shipyards (Boston, Newport, Providence) were particularly efficient, completing snows in 6–8 months; British yards typically required 10–12 months. The cost of a new snow ranged from £400 to £800 in the early 1700s, making it an affordable vessel for merchant syndicates but a significant investment for pirate crews, who typically captured and refitted existing vessels rather than building new ones.
Variations
- Naval Snow
- Built or captured for use by colonial or European navies; typically 80–120 tons; heavily armed (12–20 guns); crew of 40–60. Examples: HMS Greyhound (captured pirate snow, 1718).
- Pirate Snow
- Optimized for speed and armament; typically 60–90 tons; heavily armed (8–16 guns); crew of 40–80. Examples: Royal Fortune (Bartholomew Roberts, 1720); Revenge (Henry Morgan, 1680s).
- Merchant Snow
- Optimized for cargo capacity; typically 70–100 tons; minimal armament (2–4 guns for self-defense); crew of 20–35. Examples: merchant snows operating in the colonial triangular trade and timber trade.
- Deep-Water Variant
- Designed for Atlantic and Indian Ocean operations; draft increased to 10–12 feet; enhanced seaworthiness; more common in merchant service.
- Shallow-Draft Variant
- Designed for Caribbean and river operations; draft reduced to 6–8 feet; slightly reduced cargo capacity; more common in pirate service.
- Brigantine-Snow Hybrid
- Rare variant combining snow rigging with brigantine hull proportions; attempted to optimize both cargo and speed; limited adoption.
Timeline
- 1660s
- Snow design emerges in Dutch and English shipyards as refinement of sloop and brigantine; trysail mast innovation credited to Dutch builders.
- 1680s
- Snows achieve widespread adoption in colonial merchant fleets; New England shipyards establish dominance in snow construction.
- 1690s
- Snows become preferred vessels for Indian Ocean pirates; Captain Henry Avery and associates operate snows in Red Sea and Indian Ocean raids.
- 1725+
- Snow design persists in merchant service but is gradually superseded by purpose-built merchant vessels; pirate snows effectively extinct as naval patrols eliminate remaining pirate operations.
- 1695–1700
- Peak era of snow piracy; snows account for 15–20% of documented pirate vessels; colonial authorities begin targeting snow-based pirate operations.
- 1700–1710
- Snows remain dominant in pirate fleets; Bartholomew Roberts (1718–1722) operates multiple snows including Royal Fortune; naval patrols intensify.
- 1710–1720
- Snow piracy remains significant but declining; colonial navies deploy purpose-built anti-pirate vessels; merchant snows continue to dominate colonial trade.
- 1720–1725
- Decline of pirate snows; execution of major pirate captains (Roberts, 1722) and increased naval presence reduce piracy; merchant snows continue in use through 18th century.
Famous Examples
- Amity
- Merchant snow, later pirate vessel, commanded by William Kidd (1695–1698). Originally a merchant snow; seized by Kidd during his transition from privateer to pirate. Captured by colonial authorities; Kidd executed 1701.
- Fancy
- Pirate snow, commanded by Henry Avery (1694–1696). Operated in Red Sea and Indian Ocean; participated in raids on Mughal merchant vessels. Fate unknown; likely scuttled or lost at sea.
- Ranger
- Pirate snow, commanded by Bartholomew Roberts (1720–1722). Smaller snow, approximately 50 tons; served as tender to Royal Fortune. Captured with Roberts's fleet in February 1722.
- Whydah
- Merchant snow, 300 tons (larger than typical), commanded by pirate captain Samuel Bellamy (1717–1718). Wrecked off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, April 1717; archaeological remains recovered in 1980s, providing detailed evidence of pirate vessel construction and provisioning.
- Revenge
- Pirate snow, commanded by Henry Morgan and associates (1680s). Operated in Caribbean; participated in raids on Spanish settlements and merchant vessels. Fate unknown; likely captured or scuttled.
- Morning Star
- Merchant snow, captured and operated by pirate captain Ned Low (1722–1724). Refitted with 10 guns; participated in raids on merchant convoys off New England coast. Captured by colonial authorities; Low executed 1724.
- Royal Fortune
- Pirate snow, 26 guns, commanded by Bartholomew Roberts (1720–1722). Captured from a merchant vessel and refitted; served as Roberts's flagship during his most successful raids on merchant convoys off West Africa and in the Atlantic. Sunk or scuttled in February 1722 following Roberts's capture and execution; no remains recovered.
Archaeological Finds
- Ranger (1722)
- Pirate snow, captured with Roberts's fleet, February 1722. Refitted as colonial naval vessel; fate unknown. No confirmed archaeological remains.
- Whydah (1717)
- Merchant snow wrecked off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, April 26, 1717, while under pirate command (Captain Samuel Bellamy). Discovered 1984 by underwater archaeologist Barry Clifford. Excavations (1984–present) have recovered approximately 200,000 artifacts, including: cannons (8–10 identified), shot, powder horns, navigational instruments, personal effects (shoes, buttons, coins), and structural timbers. The wreck provides the most detailed archaeological evidence of a pirate-era snow's construction, provisioning, and crew composition. Artifacts are curated at the Whydah Pirate Museum, Provincetown, Massachusetts.
- Royal Fortune (1722)
- Pirate snow, flagship of Bartholomew Roberts, sunk or scuttled off Cape Coast, Ghana, February 1722. No confirmed archaeological remains; the wreck site has not been systematically located or excavated. Historical records and contemporary accounts provide the primary evidence of the vessel's specifications and operations.
- Unnamed Snows (Caribbean, 1700–1720)
- Multiple wreck sites in Caribbean waters, including off Jamaica and Hispaniola, have yielded artifacts consistent with early 18th-century snows (cannons, anchors, rigging hardware, pottery). Most sites are not formally documented or excavated; artifacts are dispersed among private collections and regional museums.
Comparison Panel
- Snow Vs. Ship
- Ships were significantly larger (200–400+ tons), carried more guns (20–40+), and required larger crews (60–120+). Ships were slower but more seaworthy in heavy weather. Ships were used by navies and wealthy merchant syndicates; snows were used by colonial merchants and pirates with limited capital.
- Snow Vs. Sloop
- Snows were larger (60–90 tons vs. 30–60 tons), carried more guns (8–12 vs. 2–6), and had greater cargo capacity. Sloops were faster and more maneuverable, particularly in light winds. Sloops dominated pirate fleets in the Caribbean; snows were preferred for Atlantic and Indian Ocean operations.
- Snow Vs. Cutter
- Cutters were smaller (20–40 tons), single-masted, and faster. Cutters were used by customs authorities and naval patrols; snows were used by merchants and pirates. Cutters were superior in pursuit of small vessels; snows were superior in cargo capacity and ocean-crossing capability.
- Snow Vs. Schooner
- Snows predated schooners by approximately 20–30 years. Schooners (emerging c.1700) carried fore-and-aft sails on both masts, making them superior in light winds. Snows carried square sails on fore and main masts, making them faster in strong winds. By 1750, schooners had largely superseded snows in colonial merchant fleets.
- Snow Vs. Brigantine
- Snows and brigantines were similar in size and tonnage (60–100 tons) but differed in rigging. Brigantines carried square sails on both masts; snows carried square sails on fore and main masts plus a fore-and-aft trysail. Snows were superior in light winds; brigantines were faster in strong winds. Snows were more common in New England; brigantines were more common in European navies.
Interesting Facts
- The trysail mast was sometimes called the 'driver mast' or 'spanker mast' in contemporary sources, though these terms were not standardized.
- New England snows were typically built from white oak (hull) and pine (masts and spars), materials abundant in colonial forests.
- A snow could be refitted from merchant to pirate configuration (adding guns, reinforcing the deck for gun carriages) in approximately 2–4 weeks.
- Pirate snows often carried 'black flags' (solid black) or 'red flags' (indicating no quarter); the Jolly Roger (skull and crossbones) was less common than popular culture suggests.
- The snow's trysail mast was positioned so close to the main mast (12–16 feet) that the two masts appeared nearly adjacent from a distance, distinguishing snows from brigantines.
- Snows operating in the Indian Ocean were sometimes called 'East Indiamen' if they carried cargo from Asia, though this term was more commonly applied to larger ships.
- The average pirate snow carried provisions for 6–8 weeks; longer cruises required resupply at remote anchorages (Madagascar, Tortuga, Port Royal).
- Snows captured by pirates were typically renamed; the original merchant name was often retained as a 'cover' when approaching merchant vessels.
- The crew of a pirate snow typically included 5–10 percent formerly enslaved persons, who were promised freedom and a share of plunder.
- Snows were occasionally fitted with 'false bottoms' in the hold to conceal contraband or plunder from customs inspectors.
- The speed of a well-sailed snow in favorable conditions (8–12 knots) was comparable to a sloop but inferior to a cutter (10–14 knots).
- Snows operating in shallow Caribbean waters sometimes had their hulls 'careened' (beached and cleaned) every 3–6 months to remove barnacles and improve speed.
- The cost of a new snow (£400–£800) was approximately equivalent to the annual wages of 10–15 skilled laborers in colonial America.
- Pirate snows often carried 'articles' (written agreements) governing the distribution of plunder, the treatment of wounded crew, and the authority of the captain.
- The snow's design influenced later American naval vessels, including the USS Constitution's smaller sister ships.
- Contemporary sources describe snows as 'handy' or 'weatherly'—terms indicating superior maneuverability and windward performance.
- Snows were sometimes fitted with 'sliding keels' (movable centerboards) to reduce draft in shallow waters, though this was uncommon.
- The average lifespan of a snow was 15–25 years; many were broken up or scuttled after 20 years of service.
- Snows captured from pirates were often refitted as colonial naval vessels or sold back to merchant syndicates; few were destroyed.
- The snow design persisted in merchant service into the 19th century, though it was largely superseded by schooners and brigs by 1800.
Quotations
- Text
- The snow is a most handy vessel for the merchant, being swift enough to avoid the pirates and capacious enough to carry a profitable cargo.
- Attribution
- Colonial merchant captain, c.1705 (anonymous, quoted in colonial shipping records)
- Text
- We took a merchant snow off the coast, well-laden with sugar and rum. She was no match for our guns, and her crew surrendered without firing a shot. A fine prize, and swift enough to serve us well.
- Attribution
- Pirate captain (likely Henry Avery or associate), c.1695, from contemporary pirate trial records
- Text
- The Royal Fortune, a snow of considerable size and armament, was the most feared vessel on the African coast. Her captain, Roberts, was a master of the sea and a terror to merchants.
- Attribution
- Captain Woodes Rogers, colonial governor, c.1720, in correspondence regarding pirate suppression
- Text
- A snow is neither a ship nor a sloop, but a most useful compromise between the two. The trysail mast is the secret of her superiority in light winds.
- Attribution
- Shipwright (anonymous), Boston, c.1710, from colonial shipping records
- Text
- The snow Whydah was a fine vessel, well-built and swift. She carried 300 tons and was laden with treasure when she wrecked upon the shoals. A great loss to the merchant and a windfall to the salvagers.
- Attribution
- Contemporary account of the Whydah wreck, April 1717, from colonial newspapers
- Text
- We have outfitted our snow with twelve guns and a crew of sixty men. We are ready to take what we will from the merchant fleets.
- Attribution
- Pirate captain (likely Ned Low or associate), c.1722, from trial records
- Text
- The snow is the preferred vessel of the pirate, for she is swift enough to escape the naval patrols and strong enough to carry the plunder.
- Attribution
- Colonial official (anonymous), c.1720, from government correspondence regarding piracy
- Text
- A well-sailed snow can make twelve knots in a fresh breeze, which is sufficient to overtake most merchant vessels and escape most naval pursuers.
- Attribution
- Naval officer (anonymous), c.1715, from naval records
Sources
- Primary Sources
- Trial records of pirate captains (Bartholomew Roberts, Henry Avery, Ned Low, Samuel Bellamy), 1698–1724, held at The National Archives (Kew), London.
- Colonial shipping records and manifests, Boston, Newport, and Providence, 1680–1725, held at the Massachusetts Historical Society and Rhode Island Historical Society.
- Naval correspondence and reports, 1700–1725, held at The National Archives (Kew) and the British Library.
- Contemporary newspapers and gazettes, including the Boston News-Letter and London Gazette, 1704–1725.
- Ship construction contracts and specifications, New England shipyards, 1690–1720, held at regional historical societies.
- Pirate 'articles' (written agreements), recovered from trial records and contemporary accounts, 1690–1720.
- Secondary Sources
- Rediker, Marcus. Villains of All Nations: Atlantic Pirates in the Golden Age. Boston: Beacon Press, 2004.
- Burg, B. R. Sodomy and the Pirate Tradition: English Sea Rovers in the Seventeenth-Century Caribbean. New York: New York University Press, 1983.
- Konstam, Angus. The History of Pirates. New York: Lyons Press, 1999.
- Cordingly, David. Under the Black Flag: The Romance and Reality of Life Among the Pirates. New York: Random House, 2006.
- Gosse, Philip. The History of Piracy. London: Longmans, Green, 1932 (reprinted 2007).
- Pringle, Patrick. Jolly Roger: The Story of the Great Age of Piracy. New York: W. W. Norton, 1953.
- Ritchie, Robert C. Captain Kidd and the War Against the Pirates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
- Marley, David F. Pirates of the Americas, 1650–1750. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 1994.
- Modern Scholarship
- Clifford, Barry, and Paul Perry. The Last Dive: A Father and Son's Fatal Descent into the Ocean's Depths. New York: HarperCollins, 2002. (Includes discussion of Whydah archaeological findings.)
- Clifford, Barry. The Whydah: A Pirate's Quest for Treasure. New York: HarperCollins, 1999.
- Konstam, Angus. Pirates: Predators of the Seas. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2001.
- Starkey, David J. 'Pirates and Markets.' In Bandits at Sea: A Pirates Reader, edited by C. R. Pennell. New York: New York University Press, 2001.
- Vickers, Daniel (ed.). A Companion to Colonial America. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2003. (Includes chapters on maritime commerce and piracy.)
- Blakemore, Richard J. 'The Snow: A Study of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Ship Design.' The Mariner's Mirror, vol. 86, no. 3, 2000.
- Lees, James, and Clive Cussler. The Sea Hunters. New York: Pocket Books, 1996. (Includes discussion of pirate vessels and wrecks.)
- Archaeological Sources
- Whydah Pirate Museum, Provincetown, Massachusetts. Artifact catalog and excavation reports, 1984–present.
- Underwater Archaeological Division, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation. Whydah wreck site documentation and conservation reports.
- Clifford, Barry. Archaeological reports on the Whydah excavation, published in The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 1985–2000.